Why Romano’s review was “good” ?
-Gives reasons on why the argument is valid and states numerous reasons to prove this thesis. Add’s in quotes directly from essay.
-Gives reasons on why the argument fails because it fails to anticipate the outcomes that the essay might bring, such a questions and objections certain parents might think of. Also fails to include non contact sports.
I also agree with Starskys argument because I’ve seen many girls on my soccer team quit, because
1. It was too competitive
2. Players were favored, and other didn’t get a chance to play because they were not as skilled.
3. Parents push their kids too far:
a. Fighting with the coaches because there child isn’t getting even playing time
b. Forcing their children to practice far too much.
c. Screaming at their children when they make a mistake on the field
d. Scolding them for a loss
e. Etc.
One argument though that I would bring up would be the idea of “Player’s Only Week”, also known as POW games. I remember playing in Long Island Junior Soccer League, and certain weekends, I think only one weekend a season, would be POW. POW is where only the player’s can talk, no coaching, and parents cannot yell or they will get thrown out. Now this can help argue the fact children are given the chance to just play, and not have parental influence.
Jackson’s review- Consider whether balancing the good with the bad in a review like this makes the argument more convincing or less so.
Jackson’s review was more than convincing, and if I was a gamer I would be more than interested in picking up this game. She separated all the specifics into categories such as sound, graphics, summary, and such. But I feel if you write a review on something that you need to balance the good with the bad, because a review is suppose to give you the pro’s and con’s to what its reviewing. Your opinion is what the essay is based on, and your’e able to give both ideas to fight the argument on whether what your review is good or bad.